Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568211›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Expression, tumor immune infiltration, and prognostic impact of HMGs in gastric cancer.

Zhiheng Wu, Yang Huang, Weiwei Yuan, Xiong Wu, Hui Shi, Ming Lu, Aman Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Overview of high mobility group box 3 (HMGB3] protein.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Structure and Functions of HMGB3 Protein.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Function ofJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiheng WuDepartment of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yang HuangDepartment of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Weiwei YuanDepartment of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xiong WuSchool of Optometry and Ophthalmology and the Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, PR China, State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Visual Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Hui ShiDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ming LuDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Aman XuDepartment of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNAffiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the past decade, considerable research efforts on gastric cancer (GC) have been expended, however, little advancement has been made owing to the lack of effective biomarkers and treatment options. Herein, we aimed to examine the levels of expression, mutations, and clinical relevance of HMGs in GC to provide sufficient scientific evidence for clinical decision-making and risk management. Methods: GC samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) XENA, Human Protein Atlas (HPA), Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), Kaplan-Meier Plotter, cBioPortal, GeneMANIA, STRING, LinkedOmics, and DAVID databases were employed. The "ggplot2" package in the R software (×64 3.6.3) was used to thoroughly analyze the effects of HMGs. qRT-PCR was performed to assess HMG levels in GC cell lines. Results: A total of 375 GC tissues and 32 paraneoplastic tissues were analyzed. The levels of HMGA1, HMGA2, HMGB1, HMGB2, HMGB3, HMGN1, HMGN2, and HMGN4 expression were increased in GC tissues relative to normal gastric tissues. HMGA1, HMGA2, HMGB1, HMGB2, and HMGB3 were highly expressed in GC cell lines. The OS was significantly different in the group showing low expressions of HMGA1, HMGA2, HMGB1, HMGB2, HMGB3, HMGN2, HMGN3, and HMGN5. There was a significant difference in RFS between the groups with low HMGA2, HMGB3, and high HMGN2 expression. The levels of HMGA2, HMGB3, and HMGN1 had a higher accuracy for prediction to distinguish GC from normal tissues (AUC value > 0.9). HMGs were tightly associated with immune infiltration and tumor immune escape and antitumor immunity most likely participates in HMG-mediated oncogenesis in GC. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses showed that HMGs played a vital role in the cell cycle pathway. Conclusions: Our results strongly suggest a vital role of HMGs in GC. HMGA2 and HMGB3 could be potential markers for prognostic prediction and treatment targets for GC by interrupting the cell cycle pathway. Our findings might provide renewed perspectives for the selection of prognostic biomarkers among HMGs in GC and may contribute to the determination of the optimal strategy for the treatment of these patients.

Indexed as

Expressiongastric cancerHMGsPrognostic biomarkersTCGA

Identifiers

PMID36568211
PMCPMC9780705
OpenAlexW4311714637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.