ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
RecurIndex assay as an aid for adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- RecurIndex-derived molecular features associated with total pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer: An exploratory prospective cohort study with single-cell transcriptomic contextualization.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Article
- Optimizing Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Early HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: The Emerging Role of Genomic Assays and ctDNA MRD.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Prognostic value of RecurIndex in differentiating HER2-low from HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer: a comprehensive clinicopathologic and molecular analysis in Chinese patients.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is a major adjuvant treatment modality for hormonal receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative early breast cancer, but only 2%-20% of patients derive practical benefits. How to balance its potential benefits and risks becomes a challenging clinical problem. The purpose of this study was to assess whether RecurIndex assay could serve as an aid for adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in Chinese patients with HR-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer. Methods: The tissue samples of pT1-2N0 HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer from multiple centers were detected using RecurIndex assay, based on which the patients were assigned into low- and high-risk groups. The survival outcomes of low- and high-risk patients including those with and without adjuvant chemotherapy were compared, and the risk factors for recurrence and metastasis were identified. Results: Totally 445 patients were eligible for analysis. By contrast to high-risk patients, low-risk patients represented better 7-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates. For low-risk patients, no significant differences were shown between those with and without adjuvant chemotherapy in 7-year RFS, DRFS and LRFS rates. These differences were also inapparent between high-risk patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. The multivariate model revealed high-risk patients had a significantly elevated risk of recurrence and metastasis than those at low risk. Conclusion: HR-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer patients at low risk stratified by RecurIndex assay might be exempt from adjuvant chemotherapy. Whether adjuvant chemotherapy may derive survival benefits for high-risk patients still needs larger cohorts to verify.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.