ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Incorporation of a machine learning pathological diagnosis algorithm into the thyroid ultrasound imaging data improves the diagnosis risk of malignant thyroid nodules.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound Radiomics for Hashimoto's Thyroiditis: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2026Review
- Improving Non-Invasive Prediction of Thyroid Nodule Malignancy: A Machine Learning-Based Clinical Approach.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- External Validation of a Predictive Model for Thyroid Cancer Risk with Decision Curve Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for intraoperative blood transfusion prediction in severe lumbar disc herniation.iScience · 2024Article
- Investigating the Applicability of the McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Nodules: A Comparison Between Patients with and Without Papillary Thyroid Cancer.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2024Article
- Applying machine learning techniques to predict the risk of lung metastases from rectal cancer: a real-world retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- An integrative analysis of single-cell and bulk transcriptome and bidirectional mendelian randomization analysis identified C1Q as a novel stimulated risk gene for Atherosclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed at establishing a new model to predict malignant thyroid nodules using machine learning algorithms. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 274 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology or surgery from October 2018 to 2020 in Xianyang Central Hospital. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression analysis and logistic analysis were applied to screen and identified variables. Six machine learning algorithms, including Decision Tree (DT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression (LR), were employed and compared in constructing the predictive model, coupled with preoperative clinical characteristics and ultrasound features. Internal validation was performed by using 10-fold cross-validation. The performance of the model was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) plot, feature importance, and correlation of features. The best cutoff value for risk stratification was identified by probability density function (PDF) and clinical utility curve (CUC). Results: The malignant rate of thyroid nodules in the study cohort was 53.2%. The predictive models are constructed by age, margin, shape, echogenic foci, echogenicity, and lymph nodes. The XGBoost model was significantly superior to any one of the machine learning models, with an AUC value of 0.829. According to the PDF and CUC, we recommended that 51% probability be used as a threshold for determining the risk stratification of malignant nodules, where about 85.6% of patients with malignant nodules could be detected. Meanwhile, approximately 89.8% of unnecessary biopsy procedures would be saved. Finally, an online web risk calculator has been built to estimate the personal likelihood of malignant thyroid nodules based on the best-performing ML-ed model of XGBoost. Conclusions: Combining clinical characteristics and features of ultrasound images, ML algorithms can achieve reliable prediction of malignant thyroid nodules. The online web risk calculator based on the XGBoost model can easily identify in real-time the probability of malignant thyroid nodules, which can assist clinicians to formulate individualized management strategies for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.