Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568135›Full record

ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2022

A flexible protruding microelectrode array for neural interfacing in bioelectronic medicine.

Helen Steins, Michael Mierzejewski, Lisa Brauns, Angelika Stumpf, Alina Kohler, Gerhard Heusel, Andrea Corna, Thoralf Herrmann, Peter D Jones, Günther Zeck and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Harnessing Intelligence from Brain Cells In Vitro.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Removal Forces of a Helical Microwire Structure Electrode.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Helen SteinsNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6105-5369
Michael MierzejewskiNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Lisa BraunsNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Angelika StumpfNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Alina KohlerNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Gerhard HeuselNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Andrea CornaNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3209-6719
Thoralf HerrmannNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4736-2274
Peter D JonesNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3200-3217
Günther ZeckNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-9883
Rene von Metzen *NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Thomas Stieglitz *Laboratory for Biomedical Microtechnology, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7349-4254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recording neural signals from delicate autonomic nerves is a challenging task that requires the development of a low-invasive neural interface with highly selective, micrometer-sized electrodes. This paper reports on the development of a three-dimensional (3D) protruding thin-film microelectrode array (MEA), which is intended to be used for recording low-amplitude neural signals from pelvic nervous structures by penetrating the nerves transversely to reduce the distance to the axons. Cylindrical gold pillars (Ø 20 or 50 µm, ~60 µm height) were fabricated on a micromachined polyimide substrate in an electroplating process. Their sidewalls were insulated with parylene C, and their tips were optionally modified by wet etching and/or the application of a titanium nitride (TiN) coating. The microelectrodes modified by these combined techniques exhibited low impedances (~7 kΩ at 1 kHz for Ø 50 µm microelectrode with the exposed surface area of ~5000 µm²) and low intrinsic noise levels. Their functionalities were evaluated in an ex vivo pilot study with mouse retinae, in which spontaneous neuronal spikes were recorded with amplitudes of up to 66 µV. This novel process strategy for fabricating flexible, 3D neural interfaces with low-impedance microelectrodes has the potential to selectively record neural signals from not only delicate structures such as retinal cells but also autonomic nerves with improved signal quality to study neural circuits and develop stimulation strategies in bioelectronic medicine, e.g., for the control of vital digestive functions.

Indexed as

EngineeringMaterials science

Identifiers

PMID36568135
PMCPMC9772315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.