Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568025›Full record

ReviewPaediatrics and child health2022

'Rules for radicals': a subversive's guide to putting social paediatrics into practice.

Guddi Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatrics and child health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Introducing Social Dermatology.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guddi SinghConsultant in Neurodevelopmental and Social Paediatrics, King's College London, United Kingdom. Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paediatricians witness the social determinants of health in action in their clinical practice every day. By pushing hundreds of thousands of children into poverty, the global coronavirus pandemic has only made the link between social justice and health inequalities in the UK clearer and more relevant than ever. Yet paediatricians face a glaring dearth of opportunities to meaningfully engage with the issue, and lack the resources with which to learn what can be done about it. Using real-life examples from the author's own professional experience, this article demonstrates how ordinary paediatricians can apply a theoretical framework to clinical practice to move from

Indexed as

child povertycommunity of practicehealth inequalitiesprofessionalismsocial determinants of healthsocial justice

Identifiers

PMID36568025
PMCPMC9760844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.