ArticleNumerical algorithms2023
Numerical methods for CT reconstruction with unknown geometry parameters.
Article in Numerical algorithms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) techniques are well known for their ability to produce high-quality images needed for medical diagnostic purposes. Unfortunately, standard CT machines are extremely large, heavy, require careful and regular calibration, and are expensive, which can limit their availability in point-of-care situations. An alternative approach is to use portable machines, but parameters related to the geometry of these devices (e.g., distance between source and detector, orientation of source to detector) cannot always be precisely calibrated, and these parameters may change slightly when the machine is adjusted during the image acquisition process. In this work, we describe the non-linear inverse problem that models this situation, and discuss algorithms that can jointly estimate the geometry parameters and compute a reconstructed image. In particular, we propose a hybrid machine learning and block coordinate descent (ML-BCD) approach that uses an ML model to calibrate geometry parameters, and uses BCD to refine the predicted parameters and reconstruct the imaged object simultaneously. We show using numerical experiments that our new method can efficiently improve the accuracy of both the image and geometry parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.