ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2022
Identifying the factors affecting on interaction of faculty member: A meta-synthesis.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of pedagogical environment and instructor support on classroom interaction and cognitive engagement among medical students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Assessing educational gaps in Iran's nursing education system: a mixed-method approach to the infectious diseases curriculum.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- What do students expect from teaching assistants (TAs)? Considerations of gender, race, and international status.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ability to interact and communicate effectively is one of the factors affecting the performance of faculty members, which is considered one of their basic competencies. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors affecting on interaction of faculty member with student and colleague, through the synthesis of literature. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe research method was qualitative with a meta-synthesis approach. Meta-synthesis was performed with Sandelowski and Barroso method. After the research of databases in the period 1995-2021, 259 studies were collected and finally 48 sources were selected and were included in the analysis phase. Coding method was used to analyze the data.
resultsAnalyzing the findings of previous researchers and synthesizing the results, 155 codes, 18 subcategories, and 6 categories were identified and validated through kappa coefficient. The categories included "emotional-cognitive factor," "sociocultural factor," "communication factor," "professional factor," "educational factors," and "management factor."
conclusionBased on the findings of this study and the importance of faculty members' interactions in medical universities, it is recommended that university officials and administrators use the results of this study to provide a suitable platform for creating and strengthening these interactions through holding workshops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.