Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36567833›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medicine and life2022

Sequential (two-step) day 3/day 5 frozen-thawed embryo transfer: does it improve the pregnancy rate of patients suffering recurrent implantation failure?

Soheila Arefi, Mina Ataei, Narges Maleki, Nahid Yari, Saeid Razi, Sara Amirajam

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medicine and life, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of sequential embryo transfer onFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Soheila ArefiMonoclonal Antibody Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Mina AtaeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Medical Sciences, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Narges MalekiAvicenna Infertility Clinic, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Nahid YariBahman Infertility Center, Tehran, Iran.
Saeid RaziReproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Sara AmirajamAvicenna Infertility Clinic, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research · IRBiotechnology Research Center · IRIsfahan Fertility and Infertility Center · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The best time of endometrial receptivity is the missing part of the implantation puzzle in patients with recurrent in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure. There are various treatment plans and strategies to meet the best endometrial timing for implantation. However, the lack of synchronization of the good-quality embryo with the patient's individual "window of implantation" is the hypothesis for most IVF failures so far. Sequential embryo transfer (ET) theoretically extends the availability time of embryos on the window of implantation. The study aimed to evaluate the improvement of pregnancy rate in sequential (two-step) frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) on day 3/day 5 in individuals who suffer from repeated IVF failures. This randomized controlled trial study was done in a university-affiliated infertility center for women with repeated consecutive IVF failures. Two hundred women aged 20-39 years who met our inclusion criteria were included in the study between January 2020 and September 2021. Participants were allocated with a 1:1 ratio to either sequential (two-step) ET on day 3/day 5 (study group, n=100) and conventional day 5 FET (n=100, control group). The frozen-thawed embryos were transferred to hormone replacement therapy-prepared endometrium in both groups. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and implantation rates. The secondary outcomes were early pregnancy loss and multiple pregnancies. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the sequential (two-step) FET group (40%) compared to the day 5 group (19%) (P<0.001). The sequential transfer of frozen-thawed embryos on day 3/day 5 was more effective than regular day 5 for patients suffering from repeated IVF failure.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo TransferEmbryo ImplantationFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyPregnancy Rateday 5 embryo transferrandomized clinical trialrepeated implantation failuresequential embryo transfer

Identifiers

PMID36567833
PMCPMC9762366
OpenAlexW4313424624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.