Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36567710›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Integrating extrusion complex-associated pattern to predict cell type-specific long-range chromatin loops.

Yajing Deng, Li Tang, Xiaolong Zhou, Wenkang Wang, Min Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ATRX: From Chromatin Remodeling to Disease.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yajing DengHunan Provincial Key Lab on Bioinformatics, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Li TangHunan Provincial Key Lab on Bioinformatics, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Xiaolong ZhouHunan Provincial Key Lab on Bioinformatics, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Wenkang WangHunan Provincial Key Lab on Bioinformatics, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Min LiHunan Provincial Key Lab on Bioinformatics, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chromatin loop plays a critical role in the study of gene expression and disease. Supervised learning-based algorithms to predict the chromatin loops require large priori information to satisfy the model construction, while the prediction sensitivity of unsupervised learning-based algorithms is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, we propose an unsupervised algorithm, Ecomap-loop. It takes advantage of extrusion complex-associated patterns, including CTCF, RAD21, and SMC enrichments, as well as the orientation distribution of CTCF motif of loops to build feature matrices; then the eigen decomposition model is employed to obtain the cell type-specific loops. We compare the performance of Ecomap-loop with the state-of-the-art unsupervised algorithm using Hi-C, ChIA-PET, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL), and CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) screen data; the results show that Ecomap-loop achieves the best in four cell types. In addition, the functional analysis reveals the ability of Ecomap-loop to predict active functionality-related and cell type-specific loops.

Indexed as

computational bioinformaticsComputing methodologygenomic analysismethodology in biological sciences

Identifiers

PMID36567710
PMCPMC9768375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.