Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36567678›Full record

ArticleElectronics2022

ROENet: A ResNet-Based Output Ensemble for Malaria Parasite Classification.

Ziquan Zhu, ShuiHua Wang, YuDong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electronics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. ReRNet: A Deep Learning Network for Classifying Blood Cells.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ziquan ZhuSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, East Midlands, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
ShuiHua WangSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, East Midlands, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
YuDong ZhangSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, East Midlands, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: (1)People may be infected with an insect-borne disease (malaria) through the blood input of malaria-infected people or the bite of Anopheles mosquitoes. Doctors need a lot of time and energy to diagnose malaria, and sometimes the results are not ideal. Many researchers use CNN to classify malaria images. However, we believe that the classification performance of malaria parasites can be improved. Methods: (2)In this paper, we propose a novel method (ROENet) to automatically classify malaria parasite on the blood smear. The backbone of ROENet is the pretrained ResNet-18. We use randomized neural networks (RNNs) as the classifier in our proposed model. Three RNNs are used in ROENet, which are random vector functional link (RVFL), Schmidt neural network (SNN), and extreme learning machine (ELM). To improve the performance of ROENet, the results of ROENet are the ensemble outputs from three RNNs. Results: (3)We evaluate the proposed ROENet by five-fold cross-validation. The specificity, F1 score, sensitivity, and accuracy are 96.68 ± 3.81%, 95.69 ± 2.65%, 94.79 ± 3.71%, and 95.73 ± 2.63%, respectively. Conclusions: (4)The proposed ROENet is compared with other state-of-the-art methods and provides the best results of these methods.

Indexed as

blood smearconvolutional neural networkmalariaoutput ensemblerandomized neural networkResNet-18

Identifiers

PMID36567678
PMCPMC7613984
OpenAlexW4293144441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.