Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36567614›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ophthalmology2023

Real world outcomes of the new Tecnis Eyhance IOL.

Edward Gigon, Walid Bouthour, Georgios D Panos, Bojan Pajic, Horace Massa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adaptive-Optics-Based Simulation of Astigmatism Effects on Visual Acuity with Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edward GigonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Ophthalmology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Walid BouthourDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Ophthalmology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3877-4127
Georgios D PanosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8399-7456
Bojan PajicDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Ophthalmology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Horace MassaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Ophthalmology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5025-3856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the performance of Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 with Tecnis PCB00 IOL for far, intermediate, and near vision, in patients after bilateral cataract surgery. SETTINGS: This study was done at Geneva University Hospitals.

designThis is a retrospective study of 224 eyes that underwent cataract between May 2019 and June 2020.

methodsVisual acuity was assessed from month 1 to 12 after surgery for distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, by the same optometrist, which was blind regarding the type of IOL. The patients answered to a quality of life questionnaire. Patients were excluded for: monocular surgery, macular disease, other IOL type, or inability to reach 20/20 visual acuity in both eyes without correction.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-two eyes were excluded. Three groups were then analyzed: PCB00 group (38 eyes), ICB00 group (22 eyes), and mismatch group (12 eyes). Monocular visual acuities (CIVA, UNVA and CNVA, in logMAR) were higher in the ICB00 group than the PCB00 group (respectively 0.3 vs 0.4, p = 0.0033; 0.3 vs 0.4, p = 0.0408; 0.3 vs 0.4, p = 0.0039). Binocular visual acuities, CIVA and CNVA were higher in the ICB00 group than the PCB00 group (0.2 vs 0.4, p = 0.0061; 0.15 vs 0.3, p = 0.018). This mirrored the findings of the quality of life questionnaire. There was no significant difference between PCB00 and mismatch groups.

conclusionsthe Tecnis Eyhance was more effective for intermediate and near vision. The central defocus of the lens might help patients achieve spectacle independence and better quality of life.

Indexed as

CataractLenses, IntraocularMyopiaPhacoemulsificationHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularPatient SatisfactionProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesVision, Binocularbiometry / axial lengthclinical testsIOL calculation for primary / secondary IOLIOLsphacoemulsification

Identifiers

PMID36567614
PMCPMC10152560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.