ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2022
Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of malignant thoracolumbar compression fractures: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of Kümmell's disease: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of percutaneous mesh-container-plasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of malignant thoracolumbar compression fractures.
methodsPatients with malignant thoracolumbar compression fractures treated in a single tertiary care center between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and included in the study. Ninety-four patients who were diagnosed by pathological biopsy were divided into 2 groups according to the type of surgical treatment: the percutaneous kyphoplasty group (50 patients: 24 male, 26 female; mean age=73.02 ± 7.79 years) and the percutaneous mesh-container-plasty group (44 patients: 21 male, 23 female; mean age=74.68 ± 7.88 years). The epidemiological data, surgical outcomes, and clinical and radiological features were compared between the 2 groups. Cement leakage, height restoration, deformity correction, and cement distribution were calculated from the radiographs. The visual analog scale, Oswestry disability index, Karnofsky performance scale scores, and short-form 36 health survey domains role physi cal and bodily pain were calculated preoperatively, immediately, and 1 year postoperatively.
resultsThe visual analog scale score improved from 5 (range=4-6) preoperatively to 2 (range=2-3) immediately postoperatively in the percutaneous kyphoplasty group and from 5 (range=4-6) preoperatively to 2 (range=2-2) immediately postoperatively in the percutane ous mesh-container-plasty group; there was a significant difference between the 2 groups (P=.018). Although Oswestry disability index, Karnofsky performance scale, short-form 36 health survey domains bodily pain and role physical significantly improved in both groups after surgery compared to the preoperative period, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). The mean cost in the percutaneous kyphoplasty group was lower than that in the percutaneous mesh-container-plasty group (5563 ± 439 vs. 6569 ± 344 thousand dollars, P < .05). There was no difference between the cement volume in the 2 groups, and cement distribution in the percutaneous mesh-container-plasty group was higher than that in the percutaneous kyphoplasty group (44.30% ± 10.25% vs. 32.54% ± 11.76%, P < .05). Cement leakage was found to be lesser in the percutaneous mesh-container-plasty group (7/44) than in the percutane ous kyphoplasty group (18/50, P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences in the recovery of vertebral body height and improvement of segmental kyphosis between the 2 groups (P > .05).
conclusionPercutaneous kyphoplasty and percutaneous mesh-container-plasty both have significant abilities in functional recovery, height restoration, and segment kyphosis improvement in treating malignant thoracolumbar compression fractures. Percutaneous mesh container-plasty may be better able to relieve pain, inhibit cement leakage, and improve cement distribution than percutaneous kypho plasty. However, percutaneous mesh-container-plasty requires a relatively longer procedure and is more expensive than percutaneous kyphoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.