ArticlePharmacotherapy2023
In silico evaluation of a beta-lactam dosing guideline among adults with serious infections.
Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous versus intermittent infusion of β-lactams in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- In silico evaluation of a beta-lactam dosing guideline among adults with serious infections.Pharmacotherapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the achievement of therapeutic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) exposure targets for beta-lactam antibiotics using product information dosing or guideline-based dosing for the treatment of serious infections.
designIn silico study. DATA SOURCE: ID-ODS PATIENTS AND
interventionNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsIn silico product information and guideline-based dosing simulations for cefepime, ceftazidime, flucloxacillin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam were performed using pharmacokinetic models from seriously ill patient populations. The median simulated concentration at 48 and 96 h was used to measure the probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve predefined therapeutic and toxicity PK-PD targets. A multiple linear regression model was constructed to identify the effect of guideline-based dosing covariates on achieving pre-defined therapeutic targets. In total, 480 dosing simulations were performed. The PTA percentage with guideline-based dosing at 48 and 96 h was 80% and 68%, respectively, yielding significantly higher results when compared to product information dosing (48.45% and 49%, respectively), p < 0.001 at both time points. At 48 h, predefined toxicity thresholds were exceeded in 4.7% and 0% of simulations for guideline-based and product information-based dosing, respectively (p = 0.002). eGFR was significantly associated with the % PTA by guideline-based dosing, with eGFR values of 20 and 50 ml/min both statistically significant in leading to an increase in PTA.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated that achievement of PK-PD exposures associated with an increased likelihood of effectiveness was more likely to occur with guideline-based dosing; especially at 48 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.