Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36567453›Full record

SynthesisIntegrative cancer therapies

Orally Administered Probiotics in the Prevention of Chemotherapy (± Radiotherapy)-Induced Gastrointestinal Toxicity: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Radoslav Danis, Michal Mego, Mariya Antonova, Radka Stepanova, Adam Svobodnik, Renata Hejnova, Martin Wawruch

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Radoslav DanisComenius University in Bratislava Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-0836-0281
Michal MegoComenius University in Bratislava Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Mariya AntonovaANOVA CRO s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic.
Radka StepanovaANOVA CRO s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic.
Adam SvobodnikANOVA CRO s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic.
Renata HejnovaMasaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin WawruchComenius University in Bratislava Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Czech Radio · CZComenius University Bratislava · SKMasaryk University · CZNational Cancer Institute · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemoradiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity may lead to a significant impairment of the oncological patient's quality of life, as well as to reduced adherence to the treatment, which may have a negative impact on survival and mortality rates.

objectiveThe aim of this review was to investigate whether oral probiotic administration prevents chemotherapy (± radiotherapy)-induced gastrointestinal toxicity, particularly diarrhea.

methodsWe searched the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases for randomized controlled trials in English published between 1990 and 2020. We conducted statistical data analyses expressing the treatment effect size as a risk ratio (RR) together with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Implications are based on trials rated as having a low risk of bias (RoB).

resultsWe included 8 trials (n = 697 participants), from which 3 studies rated as low RoB contained primary endpoint data; the risk of developing grade 3/4 diarrhea in patients receiving probiotics was reduced by 78% compared to the control group (RR = 0.22 [95% CI 0.05-1.08];

conclusionsProbiotics failed to prove a preventive effect of statistical significance against the development of severe and overall diarrhea in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy (± radiotherapy). However, we cannot rule out that the effects of probiotics are clinically relevant, especially in certain subgroups of patients. This needs to be clarified in further well-performed studies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProbioticsDiarrheaHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicadverse effectscancerchemotherapydiarrheapreventionprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID36567453
PMCPMC9806400
OpenAlexW4312931606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.