Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36567379›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of asbestosis: analysis of a database with applicants for asbestosis state aid.

Kevin B W Groot Lipman, Cornedine J de Gooijer, Thierry N Boellaard, Ferdi van der Heijden, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Zuhir Bodalal, Stefano Trebeschi, Jacobus A Burgers

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin B W Groot LipmanDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornedine J de GooijerDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thierry N BoellaardDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ferdi van der HeijdenDepartment of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Regina G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zuhir BodalalDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefano Trebeschi *Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacobus A Burgers *Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.burgers@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLMaastricht University · NLOncode Institute · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn many countries, workers who developed asbestosis due to their occupation are eligible for government support. Based on the results of clinical examination, a team of pulmonologists determine the eligibility of patients to these programs. In this Dutch cohort study, we aim to demonstrate the potential role of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system for automated, standardized, and cost-effective evaluation of applications for asbestosis patients.

methodsA dataset of n = 523 suspected asbestosis cases/applications from across the Netherlands was retrospectively collected. Each case/application was reviewed, and based on the criteria, a panel of three pulmonologists would determine eligibility for government support. An AI system is proposed, which uses thoracic CT images as input, and predicts the assessment of the clinical panel. Alongside imaging, we evaluated the added value of lung function parameters.

resultsThe proposed AI algorithm reached an AUC of 0.87 (p < 0.001) in the prediction of accepted versus rejected applications. Diffusion capacity (DLCO) also showed comparable predictive value (AUC = 0.85, p < 0.001), with little correlation between the two parameters (r-squared = 0.22, p < 0.001). The combination of the imaging AI score and DLCO achieved superior performance (AUC = 0.95, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability between pulmonologists on the panel was estimated at alpha = 0.65 (Krippendorff's alpha).

conclusionWe developed an AI system to support the clinical decision-making process for the application to the government support for asbestosis. A multicenter prospective validation study is currently ongoing to examine the added value and reliability of this system alongside the clinic panel. KEY POINTS: • Artificial intelligence can detect imaging patterns of asbestosis in CT scans in a cohort of patients applying for state aid. • Combining the AI prediction with the diffusing lung function parameter reaches the highest diagnostic performance. • Specific cases with fibrosis but no asbestosis were correctly classified, suggesting robustness of the AI system, which is currently under prospective validation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAsbestosisCohort StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceAsbestosAsbestosisRespiratory function testsTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID36567379
PMCPMC10121486
OpenAlexW4312195034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.