Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36567349›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

Staphylococcus aureus populations from the gut and the blood are not distinguished by virulence traits-a critical role of host barrier integrity.

Elisa J M Raineri, Sandra Maaß, Min Wang, Siobhan Brushett, Laura M Palma Medina, Neus Sampol Escandell, Dania Altulea, Erwin Raangs, Anne de Jong, Elias Vera Murguia and 7 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gut microbes · 2025
    Article
  8. The secreted proteasesVirulence · 2025
    Article
  9. Ethanolic Extract of Kinkeliba (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Lactobacilli-host interactions inhibitFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Beyond the double helix: the multifaceted landscape of extracellular DNA inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Elisa J M RaineriDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sandra MaaßDepartment of Microbial Proteomics, Institute of Microbiology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Min WangDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Siobhan BrushettDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Laura M Palma MedinaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Neus Sampol EscandellDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dania AltuleaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erwin RaangsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anne de JongDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Elias Vera MurguiaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Edward J FeilDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, The Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Alex W FriedrichDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Girbe BuistDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dörte BecherDepartment of Microbial Proteomics, Institute of Microbiology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Silvia García-CobosDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Natacha Couto *Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan Maarten van Dijl *Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.m.van.dijl01@umcg.nl.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 202085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus aureus is an asymptomatically carried member of the microbiome of about one third of the human population at any given point in time. Body sites known to harbor S. aureus are the skin, nasopharynx, and gut. In particular, the mechanisms allowing S. aureus to pass the gut epithelial barrier and to invade the bloodstream were so far poorly understood. Therefore, the objective of our present study was to investigate the extent to which genetic differences between enteric S. aureus isolates and isolates that caused serious bloodstream infections contribute to the likelihood of invasive disease.

resultsHere, we present genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that compare the genome sequences of 69 S. aureus isolates from enteric carriage by healthy volunteers and 95 isolates from bloodstream infections. We complement our GWAS results with a detailed characterization of the cellular and extracellular proteomes of the representative gut and bloodstream isolates, and by assaying the virulence of these isolates with infection models based on human gut epithelial cells, human blood cells, and a small animal infection model. Intriguingly, our results show that enteric and bloodstream isolates with the same sequence type (ST1 or ST5) are very similar to each other at the genomic and proteomic levels. Nonetheless, bloodstream isolates are not necessarily associated with an invasive profile. Furthermore, we show that the main decisive factor preventing infection of gut epithelial cells in vitro is the presence of a tight barrier.

conclusionsOur data show that virulence is a highly variable trait, even within a single clone. Importantly, however, there is no evidence that blood stream isolates possess a higher virulence potential than those from the enteric carriage. In fact, some gut isolates from healthy carriers were more virulent than bloodstream isolates. Based on our present observations, we propose that the integrity of the gut epithelial layer, rather than the pathogenic potential of the investigated enteric S. aureus isolates, determines whether staphylococci from the gut microbiome will become invasive pathogens. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

SepsisStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansProteomicsStaphylococcus aureusVirulenceVirulence FactorsVirulence FactorsBacteremiaBarrierEnteric carriageS. aureus, GutVirulence

Identifiers

PMID36567349
PMCPMC9791742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.