Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36567265›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2023

Improving sandwich variance estimation for marginal Cox analysis of cluster randomized trials.

Xueqi Wang, Elizabeth L Turner, Fan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantifying the Impact of Co-Housing on Murine Aging Studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xueqi WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9449-5451
Elizabeth L TurnerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-1893

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
HEAL Collaboratory Resource Coordinating Center (PRISM) (U24): Bioethics SupplementU24AT010961 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, LESLEY H, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2019 to 2021
$6.4M
Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority PopulationsUH3CA188640 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2014 to 2017
$6.1M
North STAR Trial: Specialty Telemedicine Access for Referrals in Rural AlaskaR01DC020026 · NIDCD · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI EMMETT, SUSAN DAVIS, HIRSCHFELD, MATTHEW J · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Appalachian STAR TrialU01OD033247 · OD · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BUSH, MATTHEW LEE, EMMETT, SUSAN DAVIS · 2021 to 2021
$1.8M
Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority PopulationsUH2AT007782 · NCCIH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D, DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2012 to 2013
$859k
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT010961NCCIH NIH HHS UH2 AT007782NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA188640NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020026NIH HHS U01 OD033247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) frequently recruit a small number of clusters, therefore necessitating the application of small-sample corrections for valid inference. A recent systematic review indicated that CRTs reporting right-censored, time-to-event outcomes are not uncommon and that the marginal Cox proportional hazards model is one of the common approaches used for primary analysis. While small-sample corrections have been studied under marginal models with continuous, binary, and count outcomes, no prior research has been devoted to the development and evaluation of bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators when clustered time-to-event outcomes are analyzed by the marginal Cox model. To improve current practice, we propose nine bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators for the analysis of CRTs using the marginal Cox model and report on a simulation study to evaluate their small-sample properties. Our results indicate that the optimal choice of bias-corrected sandwich variance estimator for CRTs with survival outcomes can depend on the variability of cluster sizes and can also slightly differ whether it is evaluated according to relative bias or type I error rate. Finally, we illustrate the new variance estimators in a real-world CRT where the conclusion about intervention effectiveness differs depending on the use of small-sample bias corrections. The proposed sandwich variance estimators are implemented in an R package CoxBcv.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiasCluster AnalysisComputer Simulationbias-corrected sandwich varianceclustered time-to-event outcomesgeneralized estimating equationssmall-sample correctionsurvival analysistype I error

Identifiers

PMID36567265
PMCPMC10482495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.