Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36566520›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2023

In situ measurement of cavitation damage from single bubble collapse using high-speed chronoamperometry.

Morteza Abedini, Stefanie Hanke, Fabian Reuter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Morteza AbediniDepartment of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran; Materials Science and Engineering, Institute for Metal Technologies, University Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany. Electronic address: morteza.abedini@uni-due.de.
Stefanie HankeMaterials Science and Engineering, Institute for Metal Technologies, University Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany.
Fabian ReuterDepartment Soft Matter, Institute for Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany. Electronic address: fabian.reuter@ovgu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We quantitatively study cavitation damage non-invasively, in-place and time-resolved at microsecond resolution. A single, laser-induced bubble is generated in an aqueous NaCl solution close to the surface of an aluminum sample. High-speed chronoamperometry is used to record the corrosion current flowing between the sample and an identical aluminum electrode immersed in the same solution. This configuration makes it possible to measure the cavitation damage in the nanometer thin passive layer of the aluminum surface via the corrosion current from the repassivation. Synchronously with the corrosion current, the bubble dynamics is recorded via high-speed imaging. Correlation between the two measurements allows contributing cavitation damage to the respective stages of the bubble dynamics. The largest cavitation-induced currents were observed for the smallest initial bubble-to-surface stand-off distances. As the bubble re-expands and collapses again in several stages, further current peaks were detected implying a sequence of smaller damage. At intermediate stand-offs the bubble was not damaging and at large stand-off distances, the bubble was only damaging during the second collapse which again occurs at the solid surface.

Indexed as

AluminumCorrosionAluminumBubble DynamicsCavitationChronoamperometryCorrosionErosion

Identifiers

PMID36566520
PMCPMC9803948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.