ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2023
Improved prediction of 10-year risk of severe liver disease in the general population using commonly available biomarkers.
Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying subjects at risk of liver cirrhosis via a range of thresholds for common fibrosis markers: A Welsh general population-based cohort study.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Use of new CORE risk score to predict 10 year risk of liver cirrhosis in general population: population based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Clinical Utility of Non-Invasive Tests for Liver Fibrosis in People Living With Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Review
- Article
- The Current Status of the Liver Liquid Biopsy in MASH Related HCC: Overview and Future Directions.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Improved prediction of 10-year risk of severe liver disease in the general population using commonly available biomarkers.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstimating the risk for cirrhosis in the general population is complex. Existing prediction tools are in general unsatisfactory.
aimsTo explore if using commonly available biomarkers can improve the commonly used FIB-4 score in the identification of subgroups at risk of cirrhosis.
methodsWe used laboratory and clinical data on 126,925 individuals aged 35-79 years in Stockholm, Sweden, undergoing health examinations from 1985 to 1996. We used Swedish nationwide registries to ascertain 10-year cumulative incidence of severe liver disease, a composite of diagnoses corresponding to cirrhosis and its complications. We considered combinations of biomarkers associated with severe liver disease to identify subgroups with different risk profiles.
resultsDuring an average follow-up of 9.3 years, we ascertained 630 incident cases of severe liver disease (0.5%). Age, the FIB-4 score, diabetes or impaired glucose and gamma-glutamyl transferase (gGT) were the most relevant characteristics for classifying risk profiles. Using these factors, we identified 24 groups with a cumulative incidence of severe liver disease at 10 years ranging from 0.2% (age 35-65, low FIB-4, no diabetes or impaired glucose and normal gGT) to 32.1% (age 35-65, high FIB-4, diabetes or impaired glucose and high gGT).
conclusionsIdentification of subjects at increased risk of severe liver disease in the general population using the FIB-4 score can be substantially improved by adding age and specific biomarkers commonly available in the primary care setting. These parameters should be considered for inclusion in the development of future risk prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.