Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36566310›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2023

Whole exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of fetal clubfoot.

Ruibin Huang, Hang Zhou, Chunling Ma, Fang Fu, Ken Cheng, You Wang, Ru Li, Tingying Lei, Qiuxia Yu, Dan Wang and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A New Case ofClinics and practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruibin Huang *Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Hang Zhou *Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Chunling Ma *Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Fang FuPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Ken ChengPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
You WangPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Ru LiPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Tingying LeiPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Qiuxia YuPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Dan WangPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Shujuan YanPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Xin YangPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Dongzhi LiPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Can LiaoPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, 510620, Guangdong, China. canliao6008@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-5453
Guangzhou Medical University · CNSouthern Medical University · CNGuangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81501267National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671474National Natural Science Foundation of China 81771594National Natural Science Foundation of China 81801461National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873836Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2019A1515012034Project of Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau 201607010341Project of Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau 202201020643the sub-project of the National Key R&D Program 2021YFC2701002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis retrospective study aimed to investigate the value of whole exome sequencing (WES) for clubfoot (CF) fetuses with or without other structural abnormalities and to further explore the genetic causes of fetal CF.

methodsthis study included 83 singleton pregnancies diagnosed with fetal CF referred to our center between January 2016 and March 2022; cases were divided into two groups: isolated CF and non-isolated CF. After excluding cases with positive karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis results, WES was performed for the eligible fetuses and parents. Monogenic variants detected by WES and perinatal outcomes were recorded and evaluated at postnatal follow-up.

resultsoverall, clinically significant variations were identified in 12.0% (10/83) of fetuses, and the detection rate was significantly higher in the non-isolated than in the isolated CF group (8/36, 22.2% vs. 2/47, 4.3%, p = 0.031). We additionally detected eight (9.6%) fetuses harboring variants of unknown significance. We identified 11 clinically significant variations correlating with clinical phenotypes in nine genes from ten fetuses, with KLHL40 being the most frequent (n = 2). Furthermore, we observed a significant difference in termination and survival rates between isolated and non-isolated CF cases (27.6 vs. 77.8% and 59.6 vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001 for both).

conclusionour data indicate that WES has a high additional diagnostic yield for the molecular diagnosis of fetal CF, markedly enhancing existing prenatal diagnostic capabilities and expanding our understanding of intrauterine genetic disorders, thus assisting us to better interpret fetal phenotype in the future.

Indexed as

ClubfootExome SequencingFemaleFetusHumansKaryotypingMuscle ProteinsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesKLHL40 protein, humanMuscle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID36566310
OpenAlexW4312130902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.