Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36566257›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.

Run-Cong Nie, Tian-Qi Luo, Guo-Dong Li, Fei-Yang Zhang, Guo-Ming Chen, Jin-Xing Li, Xiao-Jiang Chen, Zhou-Kai Zhao, Kai-Ming Jiang, Yi-Cheng Wei and 3 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Overview of Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Run-Cong Nie *Department of Gastric Surgery and Melanoma Surgical Section, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China.
Tian-Qi Luo *Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China.
Guo-Dong Li *Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P.R. China.
Fei-Yang Zhang *Department of Gastric Surgery and Melanoma Surgical Section, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China.
Guo-Ming ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery and Melanoma Surgical Section, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China.
Jin-Xing LiDepartment of General Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P.R. China.
Xiao-Jiang ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery and Melanoma Surgical Section, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China.
Zhou-Kai ZhaoDepartment of Gastric Surgery and Melanoma Surgical Section, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China.
Kai-Ming JiangDepartment of Gastric Surgery and Melanoma Surgical Section, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China.
Yi-Cheng WeiDepartment of Gastric Surgery and Melanoma Surgical Section, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China.
Ming-Wei HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China. hmw503@163.com.
Shi ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China. chensh47@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Ying-Bo ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery and Melanoma Surgical Section, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, SunYat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 51006, P.R. China. chenyb@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3595-6304
Sun Yat-sen University · CNHarbin Medical University · CNTumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been increasing since the past decade, the proportion of AEG cases in two previous clinical trials (ACTS-GC and CLASSIC) that investigated the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy was relatively small. Therefore, whether AEG patients can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear.

methodsPatients who were diagnosed with pathological stage II/III, Siewert II/III AEG, and underwent curative surgery at three high-volume institutions were assessed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the selection bias.

resultsA total of 927 patients were included (the chemotherapy group: 696 patients; the surgery-only group: 231 patients). The median follow-up was 39.0 months. The 5-year overall survival was 63.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.0-67.6%) for the chemotherapy group and 50.2% in the surgery-only group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.54-0.88; p = 0.003). The 5-year, disease-free survival was 35.4% for the chemotherapy group and 16.6% for the surgery-only group (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.53-0.83; p < 0.001). After PSM, the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for AEG was maintained. Multivariate analysis for overall survival and disease-free survival further demonstrated the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, with HRs of 0.63 (p < 0.001) and 0.52 (p < 0.001), respectively.

conclusionsPostoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with operable stage II or III AEG after D2 gastrectomy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantEsophagogastric JunctionGastrectomyHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36566257
OpenAlexW4312126816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.