Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36566212›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2022

The state of the art and future trends of root canal files from the perspective of patent analysis: a study design.

Jingang Jiang, Jianpeng Sun, Zhiyuan Huang, Zhuming Bi, Guang Yu, Jingwen Yang, Yong Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Repair of perirradicular tissues in non-surgical endodontic treatment. A review].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingang JiangKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Ministry of Education, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150080, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China. jiangjingang@hrbust.edu.cn.
Jianpeng SunKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Ministry of Education, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150080, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyuan HuangState Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Zhuming BiDepartment of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University Fort Wayne, West Lafayette, 46805, USA.
Guang YuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China.
Jingwen YangNational Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Yong WangNational Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. kqcadc@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

he Fundamental Research Foundation for Universities of Heilongjiang Province LGYC2018JQ016the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province LH2021E081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this review is to present a detailed and comprehensive description of the published work from the past decade regarding methods of improved material, geometric design, and additional functions in root canal files. The main improved methods of files and the most common technologies were further addressed, underlining their advantages and main limitations. Online databases (the Derwent Innovations Index) were consulted on this topic. Published work from 2010 to 2022 was collected and analyzed the relevant papers were chosen for inclusion in this review. The patent map classified the latest phase of the root canal files based on the analysis of the number of patents. The performance of the root canal files, such as materials. Directly affects the quality of the root canal therapy. We provided a thorough review of advances in the field of root canal files. In particular, three categories of improved methods were examined and compared, including material-based methods, geometry-based methods, and those based on additional functions. To understand this state of the art of different improved methods of root canal files, we conducted a literature analysis and a series of comparisons between different methods. The features and limitations of each method of root canal files were further discussed. Finally, we identified promising research directions in advancing the methods for the improved performance of root canal files. There is no perfect technology for all material/geometric design/additional functions, capable alone of fulfilling all the specificity and necessities of every patient. Although it is very promising, the material of the files remains understudied, and further work is required to make material science a pervasive technology in root canal therapy, and contribute to endodontic and periapical diseases by assisting in the subsequent development of root canal files.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityRoot Canal PreparationHumansResearch DesignRoot Canal TherapyTitaniumTitaniumDental instrumentsDental materialsPatent analysisRoot canal fileRoot canal therapy

Identifiers

PMID36566212
PMCPMC9789667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.