ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Cross-sectional study to assess awareness of cytomegalovirus infection among pregnant women in Germany.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytomegalovirus congenital infection awareness, knowledge, and attitude towards prenatal screening among Jordanian women: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Knowledge and prevention practices regarding cytomegalovirus among pregnant women in Gondar city a multicenter cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Awareness and understanding of cytomegalovirus infection among polish pregnant women: A CASP-W cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Cytomegalovirus Infection Screening in Pregnant Women from Northwest Romania: Results of a 15-Year Follow-Up Program.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Awareness and knowledge of cytomegalovirus infection among pregnant women in French-speaking Switzerland.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- A cross-sectional study on clinical vigilance in the diagnosis and treatment of listeriosis among pregnant women and their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding listeriosis in Gansu Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Review
- Awareness of Pregnant Patients about Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection-A Semi-Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Transmission, seroprevalence, and maternal-fetal impact of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Congenital Cytomegalovirus and Hearing Loss: The State of the Art.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Cytomegalovirus seronegativity rate in pregnant women and primary cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy in rural Germany.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudy aimed to assess awareness of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and its determinants in pregnancy.
methodsCross-sectional survey was conducted in five hospital-based maternity units in Germany. Pregnant women attending the maternity departments completed interviewer/self-administered survey questionnaire. High-risk group was defined according to contact with children under five years of age (at home or at work). Quantitative analyses using multivariable logistic regression were performed.
resultsOne thousand two hundred thirty-three pregnant women were included. 48.5% (n = 598) of women reported any knowledge about risk of CMV infection during pregnancy. CMV infection was less known than other infections or diseases (education about toxoplasmosis 95.5% (n = 1,177), listeriosis 60.5% (n = 746). 38% (n = 468) of participants received education about CMV. CMV awareness was associated with the level of education and employment in childcare or medical care. Only 32% (n = 394) of the women made use of serological screening for CMV during pregnancy (individual health service). 40.8% (n = 503) of pregnant women were classified as high-risk group. They had significantly higher knowledge and education about CMV, and msignificantlycant more often use of the serological screening.
conclusionsLess than half of pregnant women surveyed were aware of potential risk associated with CMV infection during pregnancy. In our study,one-third third of pregnant women made use of the serological screening for CMV. Regarding the lack of current consensus on the role of serological CMV screening for pregnant women, hygiene preventive measures are the only evidence-based recommendation for pregnant women and knowledge increase could potentially have major public health impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.