Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36566119›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2023

Pharmacists, nurses, and physicians' perspectives and use of formal and informal interpreters during medication management in the inpatient setting.

Michelle S Keller, Johan Carrascoza-Bolanos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Interpreters don't tell you everything": experiences with medical interpretation among Latino cancer patients and caregivers with limited English proficiency.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle S KellerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA; Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. Electronic address: michelle.keller@cshs.org.
Johan Carrascoza-BolanosUniversity of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Mitigating Benzodiazepine and Sedative Use in the Hospital through Inpatient DeprescribingR01AG058911 · NIA · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI PEVNICK, JOSHUA M · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
Developing and Testing a Population Health Approach to Deprescribing and Optimizing Medications in Older AdultsK01AG076865 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Michelle Sophie Keller · 2022 to 2026
$618k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG076865NIA NIH HHS L30 AG048588NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLanguage barriers during inpatient medication management can occur during medication reconciliation on admission and discharge, and during the hospitalization. Understanding inpatient clinicians' experiences with language barriers and use of interpreters can help inform interventions aimed at improving medication management with Limited English Proficient (LEP) patients. Our objective was to examine clinicians' experiences with language barriers around inpatient medication management.

methodsWe used semi-structured interviews with pharmacist technicians, pharmacists, nurses, and physicians working in a tertiary care hospital. We used the constant comparison method to guide data collection and analysis.

resultsWe interviewed 14 providers. Nurses and physicians perceived lack of time to use formal interpreters, particularly during busy or night shifts. Clinicians strongly preferred virtual and in-person interpreter services over telephonic services, and highlighted communication challenges with patients with low health literacy, concerns about the quality of interpretation, and inconsistencies in the use of translated materials.

conclusionsEnsuring access to formal interpreters during all shifts, translation of materials into the patient/caregiver's language, and access to in-person/virtual services would improve quality of care for LEP patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Current laws require use of interpreters, but do not provide for their reimbursement, resulting in suboptimal use. Reimbursement for interpreter services may increase their availability.

Indexed as

PharmacistsPhysiciansCommunication BarriersHumansInpatientsMedication Therapy ManagementPhysician-Patient RelationsTranslatingHospitalInterpretersLanguage BarriersLimited english proficiencyMedication management

Identifiers

PMID36566119
PMCPMC9877185
OpenAlexW4311687292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.