Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36565491›Full record

ArticleEconomics and human biology2023

The impact of lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility intentions.

Irma Mooi-Reci, Trong-Anh Trinh, Esperanza Vera-Toscano, Mark Wooden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Economics and human biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irma Mooi-ReciSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. Electronic address: irma.mooi@unimelb.edu.au.
Trong-Anh TrinhMelbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. Electronic address: tronganh.trinh@unimelb.edu.au.
Esperanza Vera-ToscanoMelbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. Electronic address: e.veratoscano@unimelb.edu.au.
Mark WoodenMelbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. Electronic address: m.wooden@unimelb.edu.au.
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

The economic and social impact of pandemic mitigation policies: A cross-country analysis of macro eventsR01AG071649 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LILLARD, DEAN R · 2021 to 2025
$4.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lockdown edicts during the COVID-19 pandemic have led to concerns about consequences for childbirth plans and decisions. Robust empirical research to either refute or confirm these concerns, however, is lacking. To evaluate the causal impact of lockdowns on fertility, we exploited a large sample of Australians (aged 18-45) from a nationally representative household panel survey and leveraged variation from a unique natural experiment that occurred in Australia in 2020: a lockdown imposed in the state of Victoria, but not elsewhere in Australia. Difference-in-differences models were estimated comparing changes in fertility intentions of persons who resided in Victoria during lockdown, or within four weeks of the lockdown being lifted, and those living elsewhere in Australia. Results revealed a significantly larger decline in reported intentions of having another child among women who lived through the protracted lockdown. The average effect was small, with fertility intentions estimated to fall by between 2.8% and 4.3% of the pre-pandemic mean. This negative effect was, however, more pronounced among those aged over 35 years, the less educated, and those employed on fixed-term contracts. Impacts on men's fertility intentions were generally negligible, but with a notable exception being Indigenous Australians.

Indexed as

COVID-19AustraliaChildCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleFertilityHumansIntentionMalePandemicsAustraliaCOVID-19Fertility intentionsHILDA SurveyLockdownSocial inequality

Identifiers

PMID36565491
PMCPMC9762099
OpenAlexW4313277728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.