ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2023
CT volumetry performs better than nuclear renography in predicting estimated renal function one year after living donation.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can CT or MRI volumetry substitute scintigraphy in living kidney donor evaluation? A systematic review.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Utility of Postoperative Day 1 Technetium-99m Mercaptoacetyltriglycine Scintigraphy for Early Assessment of Graft Function in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients.Journal of transplantation · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based MRI Volumetry for Living Kidney Donor Assessment: A New Tool for Predicting Post-Donation Renal Function.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
- Utilizing computed tomography-based renal parenchymal volumes to calculate split renal function in patients with ureteral stricture disease.World journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The evaluation of split renal function (SRF) is a critical issue in living kidney donations and can be evaluated using nuclear renography (NR) or computerized tomography (CT), with unclear comparative advantages. We conducted this retrospective study in 193 donors to examine the correlation of SRF assessed by NR and CT volumetry and compared their ability to predict remaining donor renal function at 1 year, through multiple approaches. A weak correlation between imaging techniques for evaluating the percentage of the remaining kidney volume was found in the global cohort, with an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.