Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36565366›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2023

A Population-Based Helicobacter pylori Eradication Strategy Is More Cost-Effective than Endoscopic Screening.

Akiko Kowada

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06216639 (EU4Health Project Eurohelican), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06216639 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

EU4Health Project Eurohelican: A Single-center Prospective Feasibility Study of the Proposed Test-and-treat Preventive Screening Program in Younger Slovenian Participants Aged 30-34 Years With or Without Helicobacter Pylori Infection

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Public Health, SloveniaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsHelicobacter Pylori InfectionArmsBismuth Subcitrate, Esomeprazole, Metronidazole, Amoxicillin, Clarithromycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Burden of gastric cancer attributable to Helicobacter pylori in 27 countries from seven geographic regions in 2022.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2024
    Review
  10. Global strategy for prevention of gastric cancer.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  11. A mathematical simulation model to determine the optimal endoscopic screening strategy for detection of H. pylori-naïve gastric neoplasms.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Total worker healthCurrent opinion in epidemiology and public health · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Health economic evaluation on population-basedChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akiko KowadaAdvanced Research Promotion Center, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, 1757 Kanazawa, Tobetsu-Cho, Ishikari-Gun, Hokkaido, 061-0293, Japan. kowadaa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5200-4300
Health Sciences University of Hokkaido · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelicobacter pylori (HP) eradication therapy is an efficient primary prevention method to reduce gastric cancer development. In Japan, biennial endoscopic screening for individuals aged 50 years and older is currently conducted as a national gastric cancer prevention program.

aimsWe aimed to evaluate which strategy was the most optimal and cost-effective among HP eradication strategy, annual, biennial, and triennial endoscopic screening, and no screening as a national gastric cancer prevention program.

methodsWe developed a state-transition model for HP eradication strategy, annual, biennial, and triennial endoscopic screening, and no screening using a healthcare payer perspective and a lifetime horizon. We targeted a hypothetical cohort of the Japanese population in their 20 s to 80 s. The main outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, gastric cancer cases, and deaths from gastric cancer. We performed one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

resultsHP eradication strategy was more cost-effective than endoscopic screening at any interval in all age groups. Cost-effectiveness was sensitive to HP infection rate. Cost-effective acceptability curves by Monte Carlo simulations for 10,000 trials demonstrated that HP eradication strategy was 100% cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50,000 per QALY gained in all age groups. Over a lifetime, HP eradication strategy saves US$28.07 billion, increases 37.16 million QALYs, prevents 4.47 million gastric cancer cases, and saves 319,870 lives from gastric cancer.

conclusionA population-based HP eradication strategy is optimal and cost-effective for a national gastric cancer prevention program in Japan, replacing the current secondary prevention-focused biennial endoscopic screening.

Indexed as

Helicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriStomach NeoplasmsAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisEndoscopyHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedDisease eradicationEndoscopyHealth economicsHelicobacter pyloriPrimary preventionStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36565366
PMCPMC10133360
OpenAlexW4312128933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.