ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2023
The uric acid-urea distribution volume ratio is a potential marker of hydration status in patients on hemodialysis.
Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The distribution volume of uric acid is affected by the amount of extracellular water (ECW), while urea distribution volume can be considered as total body water (TBW). Thus, the ratio of distribution volumes of uric acid and urea can be paralleled to and be considered as the proxy of ECW/TBW. A total of 108 patients at our facility was included. The uric acid and urea distribution volume ratio (UUVdR) calculated from the single-pool model, which was measured within 1 month of the time when the bioimpedance index was measured. ECW/TBW at the end of the HD session was measured by InBody S10. We investigated the association between the UUVdR and the ECW/TBW values and the factors affecting the residuals of the regression equation. We also evaluated the predictive ability of overhydration or dehydration in randomly selected two groups, i.e., the training group and the validation group. ECW/TBW correlated highly with UUVdR. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only creatinine and ECW/TBW were significantly associated with regression residuals. The cutoff values of UUVdR for overhydration and dehydration were 0.666 and 0.579, respectively, in the training group. Their AUC were 0.872 and 0.898, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values in the validation group were 0.571 and 0.868 for overhydration, and 0.444 and 0.953 for dehydration, respectively. UUVdR might be a proxy of hydration status in hemodialysis patients. It may be possible to predict hydration status without dedicated devices in the epidemiological study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.