Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36565319›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Developing a primary tumor and lymph node 18F-FDG PET/CT-clinical (TLPC) model to predict lymph node metastasis of resectable T2-4 NSCLC.

Meng Wang, Liu Liu, Qian Dai, Mingming Jin, Gang Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predictive value of primary tumorCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. More than meets the eye: 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Differential diagnosis of lymphoma withJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Observational
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meng Wang *School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Liu Liu *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Qian DaiSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Mingming JinShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, 201318, China.
Gang HuangSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China. huanggang@sumhs.edu.cn.
Jiading District Central Hospital · CNShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CNShanghai Chest Hospital · CN

Funding

the Construction Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging 18DZ2260400the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81830052the Nurture Projects for the Youth Medical Talents-Medical Imaging Practitioners Program SHWRS(2020)_087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this study was to investigate whether the combined PET/CT radiomic features of the primary tumor and lymph node could predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in stage T2-4.

methodsThis retrospective study included 192 NSCLC patients who underwent tumor and node dissection between August 2016 and December 2017 and underwent

resultsThe ROC analysis showed that among the three models, the TLPC model had better predictive clinical utility and efficiency in predicting LNM of NSCLC (AUC = 0.93, accuracy = 85%; sensitivity = 0.93; specificity = 0.75) than both the TPC model (AUC = 0.54, accuracy = 50%; specificity = 0.38; sensitivity = 0.59) and the LPC model (AUC = 0.82, accuracy = 70%; specificity = 0.41; sensitivity = 0.92). The TLPC model also exhibited great potential in predicting the N2 stage in NSCLC (AUC = 0.94, accuracy = 79%; specificity = 0.64; sensitivity = 0.91).

conclusionThe combination of CT and PET radiomic features of the primary tumor and lymph node showed great potential for predicting LNM of resectable T2-4 NSCLC. The TLPC model can non-invasively predict lymph node metastasis in NSCLC, which may be helpful for clinicians to develop more rational therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F1818F-FDG PET/CTLymph node metastasisMachine learningNSCLCRadiomics-clinical

Identifiers

PMID36565319
PMCPMC9889531
OpenAlexW4312120369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.