ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023
Topiary: Pruning the manual labor from ancestral sequence reconstruction.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retracing the origin and evolution of a cryptic antimicrobial peptide within mammalian lactoferrin.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic investigation of the 100 kDa hexokinase enzyme family with the topiary ancestral sequence reconstruction pipeline.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Evolutionary analysis reveals the origin of sodium coupling in glutamate transporters.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Article
- RIBOSS detects novel translational events by combining long- and short-read transcriptome and translatome profiling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Ancestral Reconstruction and the Evolution of Protein Energy Landscapes.Annual review of biophysics · 2024Review
- Topiary: Pruning the manual labor from ancestral sequence reconstruction.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Cortical interneurons: fit for function and fit to function? Evidence from development and evolution.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Review
- Evolution avoids a pathological stabilizing interaction in the immune protein S100A9.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) is a powerful tool to study the evolution of proteins and thus gain deep insight into the relationships among protein sequence, structure, and function. A major barrier to its broad use is the complexity of the task: it requires multiple software packages, complex file manipulations, and expert phylogenetic knowledge. Here we introduce topiary, a software pipeline that aims to overcome this barrier. To use topiary, users prepare a spreadsheet with a handful of sequences. Topiary then: (1) Infers the taxonomic scope for the ASR study and finds relevant sequences by BLAST; (2) Does taxonomically informed sequence quality control and redundancy reduction; (3) Constructs a multiple sequence alignment; (4) Generates a maximum-likelihood gene tree; (5) Reconciles the gene tree to the species tree; (6) Reconstructs ancestral amino acid sequences; and (7) Determines branch supports. The pipeline returns annotated evolutionary trees, spreadsheets with sequences, and graphical summaries of ancestor quality. This is achieved by integrating modern phylogenetics software (Muscle5, RAxML-NG, GeneRax, and PastML) with online databases (NCBI and the Open Tree of Life). In this paper, we introduce non-expert readers to the steps required for ASR, describe the specific design choices made in topiary, provide a detailed protocol for users, and then validate the pipeline using datasets from a broad collection of protein families. Topiary is freely available for download: https://github.com/harmslab/topiary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.