Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36565252›Full record

ReviewMolecular microbiology2023

Variable DNA topology is an epigenetic generator of physiological heterogeneity in bacterial populations.

Charles J Dorman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Transcription activation inEcoSal Plus · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles J DormanDepartment of Microbiology, Moyne Institute of Preventive Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6018-9170
Trinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription is a noisy and stochastic process that produces sibling-to-sibling variations in physiology across a population of genetically identical cells. This pattern of diversity reflects, in part, the burst-like nature of transcription. Transcription bursting has many causes and a failure to remove the supercoils that accumulate in DNA during transcription elongation is an important contributor. Positive supercoiling of the DNA ahead of the transcription elongation complex can result in RNA polymerase stalling if this DNA topological roadblock is not removed. The relaxation of these positive supercoils is performed by the ATP-dependent type II topoisomerases DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. Interference with the action of these topoisomerases involving, inter alia, topoisomerase poisons, fluctuations in the [ATP]/[ADP] ratio, and/or the intervention of nucleoid-associated proteins with GapR-like or YejK-like activities, may have consequences for the smooth operation of the transcriptional machinery. Antibiotic-tolerant (but not resistant) persister cells are among the phenotypic outliers that may emerge. However, interference with type II topoisomerase activity can have much broader consequences, making it an important epigenetic driver of physiological diversity in the bacterial population.

Indexed as

DNADNA GyraseAdenosine TriphosphateBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, SuperhelicalDNA Topoisomerase IVDNA Topoisomerases, Type IEpigenesis, GeneticAdenosine TriphosphateDNADNA, BacterialDNA GyraseDNA, SuperhelicalDNA Topoisomerase IVDNA Topoisomerases, Type IDNA gyraseDNA supercoilingpersisterstopoisomerasestranscription bursting

Identifiers

PMID36565252
PMCPMC10108321
OpenAlexW4312119703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.