SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2023
Ross Procedure Versus Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Five-year results from a prospective, single-arm European trial on decellularized allografts for aortic valve replacement-the ARISE Study and ARISE Registry Data.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024Trial
- Mid- and Late-term Left Ventricular Diastolic Function After the Ross Procedure.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Perioperative Factors Associated with Delayed Extubation After the Ross Procedure for Aortic Regurgitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Autograft Enlargement After the Ross Procedure in Pediatric Patients: Somatic Growth or Pathologic Dilatation?World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery · 2026Review
- Evolutions in Cardiovascular Implants-A Review of Past, Present, and Future.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Lifetime Outcomes Following Intervention for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis in Childhood.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Early outcomes and predictors of mortality in native aortic valve endocarditis: results from a national registry.Open heart · 2026Article
- Short-term and midterm results of a North American multicenter study of the Ross procedure in patients older and younger than 50 years of age.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Ross procedure after prior aortic valve intervention: Outcomes from the North American Ross Consortium database.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Early Aortic Autograft Infective Endocarditis with Perivalvular Abscess Following the Ross Procedure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ross Procedure Renaissance: A Contemporary Review of Patient Selection, Technique, and Long-Term Outcomes in Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Asymptomatic Aortic Regurgitation: Evolving Imaging Markers and Contemporary Intervention Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Revisiting the Ross operation: early results from a new Ross program at a cardiovascular center in South America.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Risk factors and a nomogram for bovine jugular vein conduit failure after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: a 10-year single-center cohort.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- The Ross Renaissance: Trends and Short-Term Outcomes of the Ross Procedure in the United States.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Protected Ross technique.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- The Ross Procedure: Historical Context, Modern Outcomes, and the Road Ahead.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Ross Procedure to the Rescue-Salvaging a Young Patient After Failed Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Computational construction and design optimization of a novel tri-tube heart valve.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The Ross operation appears to restore normal survival in young and middle-aged adults with aortic valve disease. However, there are limited data comparing it with conventional aortic valve replacement. Herein, we compared outcomes of the Ross procedure with mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (M-AVR and B-AVR, respectively). Methods and Results MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through March 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies that investigated outcomes of patients aged ≥16 years undergoing the Ross procedure, M-AVR, or B-AVR. The systematic literature search identified 2 randomized controlled trials and 8 propensity score-matched studies involving a total of 4812 patients (Ross: n=1991; M-AVR: n=2019; and B-AVR: n=802). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the Ross procedure group compared with M-AVR (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.58 [0.35-0.97];
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.