Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564958›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

Mechanical and contact characteristics of foam materials within wound dressings: Theoretical and practical considerations in treatment.

Amit Gefen, Paulo Alves, Dimitri Beeckman, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez, Hadar Lev-Tov, Bijan Najafi, Terry Swanson, Kevin Woo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of IntegraEuropean burn journal · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Amit GefenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-7218
Paulo AlvesWounds Research Lab - Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Catholic University of Portugal, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-3316
Dimitri BeeckmanSkin Integrity Research Group (SKINT), University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-8716
José Luis Lázaro-MartínezDiabetic Foot Unit, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6110-0265
Hadar Lev-TovDr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Hospital Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Bijan NajafiInterdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Terry SwansonWound Education Research Consultancy (WERC), Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.
Kevin WooSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USÖrebro University · SEQueen's University · CATel Aviv University · ILUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversity of Miami · USWesley Research Institute · AU

Funding

Mölnlycke Health Care
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the treatment of acute and chronic wounds, the clinical performance of a given foam-based dressing, and, ultimately, the wound healing and cost of care outcomes are strongly influenced by the mechanical performance of the foam material/s within that dressing. Most aspects of the mechanical performance of foam materials, for example, their stiffness, frictional properties, conformability, swelling characteristics and durability, and the overall mechanical protection provided by a foam-based dressing to a wound strongly depend on the microstructure of the foam components, particularly on their microtopography, density and porosity. This article, therefore, provides, for the first time, a comprehensive, self-inclusive compilation of clinically relevant theoretical and practical considerations, based on published analytical and experimental research as well as clinical experience related to the mechanical performance of foams in foam-based wound dressings. The current bioengineering information is useful for establishing understanding of the importance of mechanical properties of foams in foam-based dressings among clinicians and researchers in industry and academia, and other potential stakeholders in the wound care field, for example, regulators and buyers. This information is also particularly important for the development of standardised test methods for the evaluation of foam-based wound dressings and resulting standard mechanical performance metrics for these dressings.

Indexed as

BandagesWound HealingHumansbioengineering testing methodsfoam dressing propertiesstiffness and durabilitystrength of adhesion and adherence modelstreatment of wounds

Identifiers

PMID36564958
PMCPMC10333050
OpenAlexW4312118143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.