Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564951›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Effects of respiratory and cardiac motion on estimating radiation dose to the left ventricle during radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Alireza Omidi, Elisabeth Weiss, John S Wilson, Mihaela Rosu-Bubulac

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alireza OmidiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3407-2160
Elisabeth WeissDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
John S WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-1261
Mihaela Rosu-BubulacDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstablish a workflow to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) dose variation induced by respiratory and cardiac motion on the left ventricle (LV) and left ventricular myocardium (LVM).

methodsEight lung cancer patients underwent 4D-CT, expiratory T1-volumetric-interpolated-breath-hold-examination (VIBE), and cine MRI scans in expiration. Treatment plans were designed on the average intensity projection (AIP) datasets from 4D-CTs. RT dose from AIP was transferred onto 4D-CT respiratory phases. About 50% 4D-CT dose was mapped onto T1-VIBE (following registration) and from there onto average cine MRI datasets. Dose from average cine MRI was transferred onto all cardiac phases. Cumulative cardiac dose was estimated by transferring dose from each cardiac phase onto a reference cine phase following deformable image registration. The LV was contoured on each 4D-CT breathing phase and was called clinical LV (cLV); this structure is blurred by cardiac motion. Additionally, LV, LVM, and an American Heart Association (AHA) model were contoured on all cardiac phases. Relative maximum/mean doses for contoured regions were calculated with respect to each patient's maximum/mean AIP dose.

resultsDuring respiration, relative maximum and mean doses on the cLV ranged from -4.5% to 5.6% and -14.2% to 16.5%, respectively, with significant differences in relative mean doses between inspiration and expiration (P < 0.0145). During cardiac motion at expiration, relative maximum and mean doses on the LV ranged from 1.6% to 59.3%, 0.5% to 27.4%, respectively. Relative mean doses were significantly different between diastole and systole (P = 0.0157). No significant differences were noted between systolic, diastolic, or cumulative cardiac doses compared to the expiratory 4D-CT (P > 0.14). Significant differences were observed in AHA segmental doses depending on tumour proximity compared to global LV doses on expiratory 4D-CT (P < 0.0117).

conclusionIn this study, the LV dose was highest during expiration and diastole. Segmental evaluation suggested that future cardiotoxicity evaluations may benefit from regional assessments of dose that account for cardiopulmonary motion.

Indexed as

Heart VentriclesLung NeoplasmsFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansRadiation DosageRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRespirationcardiac motioncardiotoxicityimage registrationradiotherapyrespiratory motion

Identifiers

PMID36564951
PMCPMC10018663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read161
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.