Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564731›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022

Corneal epithelial ingrowth after perforating corneal injury: a case report.

Adrien Quintin, Loïc Hamon, Fidelis A Flockerzi, Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt, Matthias Dias Blak, Berthold Seitz

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ocular involvement of oak processionary caterpillar hairs: Clinical outcome up to one year.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adrien QuintinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Centre (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany. Adrien.Quintin@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0452-3039
Loïc HamonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Centre (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Fidelis A FlockerziDepartment of Pathology, Saarland University Medical Centre (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Ursula Schlötzer-SchrehardtDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias Dias BlakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Berthold SeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Centre (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Saarland University · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial ingrowth is a rare complication after ocular perforation and can become manifest many years after the primary trauma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old patient presented with a positive Seidel test of unclear origin at her left eye, as well as a sharply defined anterior-stromal corneal scar at both eyes. Prior operations included a bilateral laser-assisted blepharoplasty 3 months earlier. The patient indicated to have been on holiday to France 5 months earlier, during an ongoing oak processionary moth caterpillars infestation. The examination using confocal microscopy confirmed a corneal perforation at the left eye and revealed corneal epithelial ingrowth capped with scarred stroma in both eyes. We performed a penetrating keratoplasty at the left eye. The scarred and perforated host cornea was divided into 4 pieces for further investigation: microbiology (negative), virology (negative), histology and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Histology revealed differently structured epithelium, centrally inverted into the stroma through defects in Bowman's layer. TEM revealed full thickness corneal perforation with an epithelial plug extending to the lower third of the cornea, but without evidence of epithelial cell migration into the anterior chamber. Our differential diagnosis of the unclear positive Seidel test with epithelial ingrowth was as follows: (1) corneal perforation by hairs of the oak processionary moth caterpillar, although no hairs could be found histologically; (2) corneal perforation during laser-assisted blepharoplasty, which may be supported by the presence of pigmented cells on the posterior surface of Descemet´s membrane, pointing to a possible iris injury.

conclusionConsequently, we highlighted that contact lenses can be useful, safe and inexpensive protective devices in upper eyelid procedures to protect the cornea against mechanical iatrogenic trauma.

Indexed as

Corneal InjuriesCorneal PerforationCicatrixCorneaFemaleHumansKeratoplasty, PenetratingCase reportCorneal perforationEpithelial invasionLaser-assisted blepharoplastyOak processionary moth caterpillar hair

Identifiers

PMID36564731
PMCPMC9784072
OpenAlexW4312209856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.