Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564611›Full record

ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2023

Reliability of the Heartbeat Tracking Task to Assess Interoception.

Lucas Eduardo Rodrigues Santos, Hassan Mohamed Elsangedy, Catarina Fernanda Costa Xavier Monteiro de Souza, Bruna Milene da Silva Mesquita, Cayque Brietzke, Ítalo Vinícius, Daniel Carvalho Pereira, Flávio Oliveira Pires, Tony Meireles Santos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucas Eduardo Rodrigues SantosGrad Program in Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Hassan Mohamed ElsangedyPhysical Education Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Catarina Fernanda Costa Xavier Monteiro de SouzaPhysical Education Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Bruna Milene da Silva MesquitaPhysical Education Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Cayque BrietzkeExercise Psychophysiology Research Group, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ítalo ViníciusExercise Psychophysiology Research Group, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Carvalho PereiraPhysical Education Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Flávio Oliveira PiresExercise Psychophysiology Research Group, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tony Meireles SantosGrad Program in Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil. tony.meireles@ufpe.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interoception refers to the competence in perceiving and interpreting internal sensations emerging from the body. The most common approach to assess interoception is through cardiac interoceptive tests like the heartbeat tracking task (HTT), which measures the accuracy on perceive and counting heartbeats during a period. However, the literature is scarce in providing adequate reliability evidence for this measure so that the interoception assessment may be threaten. In addition to HTT accuracy, it is possible to determine sensibility (self-reported confidence) and interoceptive awareness (correspondence between accuracy and sensibility). Thus, we measured the test-retest reliability of HTT and also investigated the behavior of HTT outcomes along the task. Therefore, 31 healthy adults (16 males) with 27.8 (9.4) years old performed two consecutive HTT interspersed by one day. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable difference (MD) analyzes showed 'Good' relative reliability for interoceptive accuracy (ICC = 0.880; SEM = 0.263; MD = 0.728; p < 0.001) and 'Moderate' for sensibility (ICC = 0.617; SEM = 0.648; MD = 1.797; p < 0.001) and awareness (ICC = 0.593; SEM = 0.227; MD = 0.628; p < 0.001). The absolute reliability shows low threshold values for observing true effects in HTT outcomes. The results also showed that reducing the number of HTT blocks did not impact the outcomes. The HTT showed to be reliable in determine the interoceptive competences in healthy adults.

Indexed as

InteroceptionAdultChildHeart RateHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportCardioceptionCounting testsHeart rateInteroception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.