Trial reportAnnals of hematology2023
Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with newly-diagnosed polycythemia vera: futility analysis of the RuxoBEAT clinical trial of the GSG-MPN study group.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02577926 (Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients With High-risk Polycythemia Vera or High-risk Essential Thrombocythemia - The Ruxo-BEAT Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients With High-risk Polycythemia Vera or High-risk Essential Thrombocythemia - The Ruxo-BEAT Trial
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hematologic and molecular response to ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with polycythemia vera: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025Guideline
- Shifting treatment goals in myeloproliferative neoplasms: focusing on polycythemia vera.International journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Review
- SOHO State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Novel Therapies for Polycythemia Vera.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2024Review
- Toxicity of targeted anticancer treatments on the liver in myeloproliferative neoplasms.World journal of hepatology · 2023Review
- JAK inhibitors for the treatment of VEXAS syndrome.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 14 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) suffer from pruritus, night sweats, and other symptoms, as well as from thromboembolic complications and progression to post-PV myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for second-line therapy in high-risk PV pts with hydroxyurea intolerance or resistance. The RuxoBEAT trial (NCT02577926, registered on October 1, 2015, at clinicaltrials.gov) is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm phase-IIb trial with a target population of 380 pts with PV or ET, randomized to receive RUX or best available therapy. This pre-specified futility analysis assesses the early clinical benefit and tolerability of RUX in previously untreated PV pts (6-week cytoreduction was allowed). Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive RUX. Compared to baseline, after 6 months of treatment, there was a significant reduction of median hematocrit (46 to 41%), the median number of phlebotomies per year (4.0 to 0), and median patient-reported pruritus scores (2 to 1), and a trend for reduced night sweat scores (1.5 to 0). JAK2V617F allele burden, as part of the scientific research program, also significantly decreased. One hundred nine adverse events (AEs) occurred in 24/28 patients (all grade 1 to 3), and no pt permanently discontinued treatment because of AEs. Thus, treatment with ruxolitinib in untreated PV pts is feasible, well-tolerated, and efficient regarding the above-mentioned endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.