Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Correlation of internet search enquiries, incidence of ophthalmological diseases and corneal, cataract and refractive surgical procedures.

Mohamed Ghaly, Diana Jaber, Mario Matthaei, Claus Cursiefen, Alexander Händel, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, Robert Hörster, Sebastian Siebelmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohamed GhalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. ghalys.mail@gmail.com.
Diana JaberUniversity of Applied Science HAW, Hamburg, Germany.
Mario MatthaeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Claus CursiefenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander HändelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Juliane Köberlein-NeuBergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Robert HörsterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sebastian SiebelmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of internet search queries (ISQ) could be useful to study public interest and medical need for corneal, cataract, and refractive surgery. To date, there are preliminary data on seasonal trends in ophthalmic conditions, but only few studies correlate these data with real data from healthcare systems. The aim of this study is to analyze ISQ and correlate it with real healthcare system data. Data were retrieved from the KBV registry of patients who underwent outpatient ophthalmic surgery in Germany from 2017 to 2019 and from Statista GmbH from 2010 to 2020 for corneal refractive surgery. Time Series analysis of ISQ was analyzed from 2004 to 2020 and correlated with healthcare system data using bivariate correlation analysis. ISQ correlated significantly with the incidence of ophthalmic procedures such as corneal transplantations (r = 0.69, p < 0.05), cataract- (r = 0.59, p < 0.05) and refractive laser surgery (r = 0.83, p < 0.05) in Germany. In addition, specific trends were observed with respect to individual surgical procedures. The correlation between search intensities and surgical procedures varied significantly. Thus, interests in surgical procedures can be tracked by observing changes in ISQ over time. These data correlate with real healthcare data and could be used in the future for now-casting or even forecasting.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionRefractive Surgical ProceduresCorneaHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID36564516
PMCPMC9782281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.