ArticleScientific reports2022
Development and experimental verification of C-arm camera shooting locator.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a self-made C-arm camera shooting locator and verify its accuracy and advantages. A total of 60 physicians and nurses from the Surgical System of Sanmen People's Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China, were randomly selected as filming operators. The C-arm machine with a self-made locator and a C-arm machine without a locator were used to measure the center of the circular plate. The iron nails were used to shoot. The distance between the iron nail and the center point of the circular display area on display was defined as the shooting deviation. When it was less than 3 cm, the shooting was stopped. The number of shots, total shooting time, and first-shot deviation in the C-arm camera shooting groups with and without the locator were statistically analyzed, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two were compared. The average number of shots, average total shooting time, and average first-shot deviation of the C-arm camera using the locator were significantly better than those in the group without the locator, and the differences were statistically significant. When the shooting distance (X) was equal to 30 cm and the shooting angle (Y) was equal to 0°, the average number of shots, average total shooting time, and average first-shot deviation were optimal. The C-arm camera shooting locator can improve the shooting accuracy of the C-arm camera and effectively reduce the number of shots and total shooting time. Hence, it can be applied in clinical and surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.