ArticleScientific reports2022
Judgment of duration and passage of time in prospective and retrospective conditions and its predictors for short and long durations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotional pictures and time: The effects of arousal and valence on the perception of duration and the subjective passage of time.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Parkinson's disease and awareness of the passage of time: Perceived health, emotion, and self-transcendence.PloS one · 2026Article
- Beyond lifespan and healthspan: a biological framework for experienced longevity.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Do "auditory" and "visual" time really feel the same? Effects of stimulus modality on duration and passage-of-time judgements.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Motivation and Time: Motivational Congruence Theory's Stance.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2025Article
- Time Dilation in Motivational Congruence Theory's Paradigm.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2025Article
- The effects of emotion on retrospective duration memory using virtual reality.Psychological research · 2024Article
- How does it feel? Passage of time judgments in speeded RT performance.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Workout at a virtual gym: Surrounding avatar's motion speed and exercise intensity effect on the user's time perception.PloS one · 2024Article
- Multidimensional assessment of time perception along the continuum of Alzheimer's Disease and evidence of alterations in subjective cognitive decline.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Experience and memory of time and emotions two years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2023Article
- Development and relationship between the judgment of the speed of passage of time and the judgment of duration in children.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Similar effect of running on visual and auditory time perception in the ranges of milliseconds and seconds.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigated participants' verbal duration judgment and judgment of passage of time (PoT) when presented with an image for a few seconds (20 to 45 s) or minutes (80 to 180 s) with prospective and retrospective temporal judgment instruction, with their level of attention devoted to time tested. Their self-reported levels of emotion and attention were also assessed, as well as their individual impulsivity traits. Structural equation analyses showed that the best predictor of PoT judgment was emotion (boredom) regardless of duration range. For duration judgment, the best predictor for short durations was attention-related factors. However, for long durations, these factors ceased to be significant and were replaced by emotion, in the same way as for the PoT judgment. Indeed, these analyses suggested that duration judgment and PoT judgment were related for long durations of more than one minute, whereas they were not related for short durations of a few seconds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.