Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564325›Full record

ArticlePain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses2023

Pilot Investigation of Somatosensory Functioning and Pain Catastrophizing in Pediatric Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Christine B Sieberg, Claire E Lunde, Cindy Wong, Juliana Manganella, Angela R Starkweather, Navil Sethna, Mallory A Perry-Eaddy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine B SiebergBiobehavioral Pain Innovations Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: christine.sieberg@childrens.harvard.edu.
Claire E LundeBiobehavioral Pain Innovations Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
Cindy WongBiobehavioral Pain Innovations Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Juliana ManganellaBiobehavioral Pain Innovations Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Angela R StarkweatherBiobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Navil SethnaBiobehavioral Pain Innovations Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mallory A Perry-EaddyUniversity of Connecticut, School of Nursing, Storrs, Connecticut; University of Connecticut, School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Storrs, Connecticut; University of Connecticut, Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP), Storrs, Connecticut; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Connecticut Children's, Hartford, CT.
Center for Pain and the Brain · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Chronic Postsurgical Pain Across the Lifespan: Brain State and TreatmentR35GM142676 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SIEBERG, CHRISTINE BARRETT · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
Pediatric Persistent Post-surgical Pain: From Animals to Application (Supplement)K23GM123372 · NIGMS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SIEBERG, CHRISTINE BARRETT · 2016 to 2020
$573k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM123372NIGMS NIH HHS L30 GM134514NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a significant concern and contributes to the opioid epidemic; however, little is known about CPSP in young people.

designThis prospective study aimed to identify sensory, psychological, and demographic factors that may increase the risk of CPSP after spinal fusion surgery for children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

methods32 children and adolescents from two children's hospitals completed quantitative sensory testing (QST) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale Child (PCS-C) pre-and 4-6 months post spinal fusion surgery. Between-group differences were assessed using an independent samples t-test. Pearson's correlations and stepwise linear regression were used to assess the relationship between variables at both time points.

results56% of patients endorsed pain post-surgery. They were more sensitive tomechanical detection on both a control non-pain site (r = -2.87, p = .004) and the back (r = -1.83, p = .04), as well as pressure pain (r=-2.37, p = .01) on the back. This group also reported worse pain scores pre-surgery. Pre-surgery helplessness positively correlated with preoperative pain (r = .67 p < .001), and age was negatively correlated with the post-surgical catastrophizing total score (r =-.39, p = .05), suggesting that younger patients endorsed more pain-related worry after surgery.

conclusionsPatients who present with pain during their preoperative appointment may need to be monitored with increased vigilance throughout the perioperative period, possibly with bedside QST and psychological questionnaires, which nurses could administer. Biobehavioral interventions targeting pain intensity and feelings of helplessness and anxiety during the preoperative period may alleviate the transition to CPSP.

Indexed as

Chronic PainSpinal FusionAdolescentCatastrophizationChildHumansPilot ProjectsPostoperative PainProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36564325
PMCPMC9925410
OpenAlexW4312129602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.