Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564205›Full record

ArticleNeurology2023

Neurology Education in 2035: The Neurology Future Forecasting Series.

Jeremy Moeller, Rachel Marie E Salas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Curriculum Innovation:Neurology. Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social Accountability in Clinical Education: A Scoping Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremy MoellerFrom the Department of Neurology (J.M.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery (R.M.E.S.), Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. jeremy.moeller@yale.edu.
Rachel Marie E SalasFrom the Department of Neurology (J.M.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery (R.M.E.S.), Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, there have been dramatic changes in all aspects of neurologic care, and along with this, neurology education has transformed. These changes have affected all aspects of education across the educational continuum, including learners, teachers, educators, content, delivery methods, assessments, and outcomes. Health systems science, health humanities, diversity, equity, and inclusion and health disparities are becoming core components of neurology curricula, and, in the future, will be integrated into every aspect of our educational mission. The ways in which material is taught and learned have been influenced by technologic innovations and a growing understanding of the science of learning. We forecast that this trend will continue, with learners choosing from an array of electronic resources to engage with fundamental topics, allowing front-line clinical teachers to spend more time supporting critical reasoning and teaching students how to learn. There has been a growing differentiation of educational roles (i.e., teachers, educators, and scholars). We forecast that these roles will become more distinct, each with an individualized pattern of support and expectations. Assessment has become more aligned with the work of the learners, and there are growing calls to focus more on the impact of educational programs on patient care. We forecast that there will be an increased emphasis on educational outcomes and public accountability for training programs. In this article, we reflect on the history of medical education in neurology and explore the current state to forecast the future of neurology education and discuss ways in which we can prepare.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalNeurologyCurriculumHumanitiesHumansLearningStudents

Identifiers

PMID36564205
PMCPMC10033166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.