ArticlePhysiological reports2022
Head-up tilt does not enhance prostate tumor perfusion or oxygenation in young rats.
Article in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Head-up tilt does not enhance prostate tumor perfusion or oxygenation in young rats.Physiological reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Solid tumors contain hypoxic regions that contribute to anticancer therapy resistance. Thus, mitigating tumor hypoxia may enhance the efficacy of radiation therapy which is commonly utilized for patients with prostate cancer. Increasing perfusion pressure in the prostate with head-up tilt (HUT) may augment prostate tumor perfusion and decrease hypoxia. The purpose of this study was to determine if an increase in the vascular hydrostatic gradient via 70° HUT increases tumor perfusion and decreases tumor hypoxia in a preclinical orthotopic model of prostate cancer. Male Copenhagen rats (n = 17) were orthotopically injected with Dunning R-3327 (AT-1) prostate adenocarcinoma cells to induce prostate tumors. After tumors were established, prostate tumor perfusion and hypoxia were measured in rats during level (0°) and 70° HUT positions. To compare the magnitude of the hydrostatic column to that present in humans, ultrasound was used to measure the heart to prostate distance in male human subjects to estimate the prostate vascular hydrostatic pressure with the upright posture. In young rats, no differences were detected in prostate tumor perfusion or prostate tumor hypoxia with 70° HUT versus the level position. However, from the retrospective study, young rats increased prostate vascular resistance to HUT, whereas aged rats lacked this response. Tumor vessels co-opted from existing functional vasculature in young rats may be sufficient to negate increases in perfusion pressure with HUT seen in aged rats. Additionally, in humans, the estimated hydrostatic column at the level of the prostate is five times greater than that of the rat. Therefore, 70° HUT may elicit increases in prostate/prostate tumor blood flow in humans that is not seen in rats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.