ArticleMedical engineering & physics2022
Effect of the soft tissue artifact on marker measurements and on the calculation of the helical axis of the knee during a squat movement: A study on the CAMS-Knee dataset.
Article in Medical engineering & physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating a Multi-Camera Markerless System for Capturing Basketball-Specific Movements: An Exploration Using 25 Hz Video Streams.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and measurement of elbow and knee joints using an electro-goniometer in healthy subjects: A preliminary study.SICOT-J · 2026Article
- A Novel Procedure for Knee Flexion Angle Estimation Based on Functionally Defined Coordinate Systems and Independent of the Marker Landmarks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMarker-based motion capture recordings of human body segments are often affected by soft tissue artifact (STA). The undesired and uncontrolled motion of the skin may introduce errors in the estimation of motion and position of body segments and, consequently, in the calculation of the relative functional quantities.
methodsThis study exploited a recently published dataset consisting of six adult subjects that underwent a total knee arthroplasty. The subject performed squat tasks while the motion was concurrently recorded by passive markers attached to the skin of the lower limbs, an optoelectronic system, and a fluoroscope. The STA of shank and thigh was decomposed in local deformation and rigid motion. Additionally, we studied how the instantaneous helical axis (IHA) calculation is affected by STA.
findingsThe cluster most affected by STA rigid motion was the thigh. The largest estimated effects were about 7 deg. and about 20 mm. The largest effect of local deformation was about 25 mm, and it was observed on the thigh cluster.
interpretationThe STA made the estimation of the IHA unreliable for both position and direction. The choice of the reference configuration influenced the results of the STA analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.