Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564094›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2022

Twenty-first century house calls: a survey of ambulatory care providers to inform organisational telehealth strategy.

Jeana M Holt, Rachel Cusatis, Natalie Mortensen, Nathan Wolfrath, Noorie Hyun, Aaron N Winn, Sherry-Ann Brown, Melek M Somai, Bradley H Crotty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeana M HoltCollege of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA jmholt@uwm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3392-0164
Rachel CusatisDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Natalie MortensenDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Nathan WolfrathDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Noorie HyunKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Aaron N WinnSchool of Pharmacy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Sherry-Ann BrownCardio-Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin Cardiovascular Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Melek M SomaiDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Bradley H CrottyDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhile patient interest in telehealth increases, clinicians' perspectives may influence longer-term adoption. We sought to identify facilitators and barriers to continued clinician incorporation of telehealth into practice.

methodsA cross-sectional 24-item web-based survey was emailed to 491 providers with ≥50 video visits (VVs) within an academic health system between 1 March 2020 and 31 December 2020. We quantitatively summarised the characteristics and perceptions of respondents by using descriptive and test statistics. We used systematic content analysis to qualitatively code open-ended responses, double coding at least 25%.

results247 providers (50.3%) responded to the survey. Seventy-nine per cent were confident in their ability to deliver excellent clinical care through VV. In comparison, 48% were confident in their ability to troubleshoot technical issues. Most clinicians (87%) expressed various concerns about VV. Providers across specialties generally agreed that VV reduced infection risk (71%) and transportation barriers (71%). Three overarching themes in the qualitative data included infrastructure and training, usefulness and expectation setting for patients and providers. DISCUSSION: As healthcare systems plan for future delivery directions, they must address the tension between patients' and providers' expectations of care within the digital space. Telehealth creates new friction, one where the healthcare system must fit into the patient's life rather than the usual dynamic of the patient fitting into the healthcare system.

conclusionTelehealth infrastructure and patient and clinician technological acumen continue to evolve. Clinicians in this survey offered valuable insights into the directions healthcare organisations can take to right-size this healthcare delivery modality.

Indexed as

House CallsTelemedicineAmbulatory CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and Questionnairesdelivery of health carehealth communicationoutcome and process assessment, health carepatient-centered caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36564094
PMCPMC9791455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.