Trial reportBlood2023
Optimizing the value of lenalidomide maintenance by extended genetic profiling: an analysis of 556 patients in the Myeloma XI trial.
Trial report in Blood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- International Myeloma Society/International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Recommendations on the Definition of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Guideline
- Alterations in chromosome 1q in multiple myeloma randomized clinical trials: a systematic review.Blood cancer journal · 2024Pooled it
- Challenging the concept of functional high-risk myeloma through transcriptional and genetic profiling.Blood · 2025Trial
- Bridging Randomized Trial Efficacy and Real-World Effectiveness in Multiple Myeloma: Integrating Clinical Trials and Real-World Evidence for Individualized Care.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Double-Hit and Single High-Risk Cytogenetic Newly Diagnosed Myeloma in Transplant-Eligible Patients.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Choosing the optimal maintenance strategy in multiple myeloma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Management of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation: position statement of the Medical and Scientific Advisory Group of Myeloma Australia.Internal medicine journal · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Post-Transplant MRD Negativity in Standard Versus High- and Ultra-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Resistance to immunomodulatory drugs in multiple myeloma: the cereblon pathway and beyond.Haematologica · 2025Review
- Article
- Lenalidomide, ixazomib, or daratumumab maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma.Blood neoplasia · 2024Article
- Insights from Clinical Trials: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Induction Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Trends in Outcomes After Upfront Autologous Transplant for Multiple Myeloma Over Three Decades.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2024Article
- The numerous facets of 1q21Oncology letters · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in The Definition of the Molecular Alterations Occurring in Multiple Myeloma.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2024Review
- Article
- Current Main Topics in Multiple Myeloma.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction of individual patient benefit from lenalidomide (Len) maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains challenging. Here, we investigated extended molecular profiling for outcome prediction in patients in the National Cancer Research Institute Myeloma XI (MyXI) trial. Patients in the MyXI trial randomized to Len maintenance or observation after ASCT were genetically profiled for t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del(1p), gain(1q), and del(17p) and co-occurrence of risk markers was computed. Progression-free survival (PFS), subsequent progression (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) were calculated from maintenance randomization, and groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Of 556 patients, 17% with double-hit multiple myeloma (MM) (≥2 risk markers), 32% with single-hit (1 risk marker), and 51% without risk markers were analyzed. Single-hit MM derived the highest PFS benefit from Len maintenance, specifically, isolated del(1p), del(17p), and t(4;14), with ∼40-fold, 10-fold, and sevenfold reduced risk of progression or death (PFS), respectively, compared with observation. This benefit translated into improved PFS2 and OS for this group of patients compared with observation; median PFS was 10.9 vs 57.3 months for observation vs Len maintenance. Patients with isolated gain(1q) derived no benefit, and double-hit MM limited benefit (regardless or risk lesions involved) from Len maintenance. Extended genetic profiling identifies patients deriving exceptional benefit from Len maintenance and should be considered for newly diagnosed patients to support management discussions along their treatment pathway. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN49407852 as # ISRCTN49407852.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.