Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36563875›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2023

Meta-analysis: The Effectiveness of Youth Psychotherapy Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Katherine E Venturo-Conerly, Danielle Eisenman, Akash R Wasil, Daisy R Singla, John R Weisz

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Child and adolescent psychiatry: challenges, solutions, opportunities, and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evidence Synthesis in Youth Mental Health for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine E Venturo-ConerlyHarvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts. Electronic address: kventuroconerly@g.harvard.edu.
Danielle EisenmanHarvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts.
Akash R WasilUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Daisy R SinglaCenter of Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John R WeiszHarvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts.
Harvard University Press · USCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBecause most youth psychotherapies are developed and tested in high-income countries, relatively little is known about their effectiveness or moderators in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing psychotherapies for youth with multiple psychiatric conditions in LMICs, and we tested candidate moderators.

methodWe searched 9 international databases for RCTs of youth psychotherapies in LMICs published through January 2021. The RCTs targeted elevated symptoms of youth anxiety (including posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] and obsessive-compulsive disorder), depression, conduct problems, and attention problems. Using robust variance estimation, we estimated the pooled effect sizes (Hedges g) at posttreatment and follow-up for intervention vs control conditions.

resultsOf 5,145 articles identified, 34 articles (with 43 treatment-control comparisons and 4,176 participants) met methodological standards and were included. The overall pooled g with winsorized outliers was 1.01 (95% CI = 0.72-1.29, p < .001) at posttreatment and 0.68 (95% CI = 0.29-1.07, p = .003) at follow-up. Interventions delivered by professional clinicians significantly outperformed those delivered by lay providers (g = 1.59 vs 0.53), but all interventions for conduct problems were delivered by professionals, and the difference for interventions targeting internalizing problems (g = 1.33 vs .53) was not significant. Interventions developed non-locally were more effective if they were not adapted to local contexts than if they were adapted locally (g = 2.31 vs 0.66), highlighting a need for further research on effective adaptations. Significant risk of bias was identified.

conclusionOverall, pooled effects of youth psychotherapies in LMICs were markedly larger than those in recent comparable non-LMIC meta-analyses, which have shown small-to-medium effects for youth psychotherapies. Findings highlight the potential benefits of youth psychotherapies in LMICs, as well as a need for more RCTs and improved study quality. STUDY PREREGISTRATION INFORMATION: Effectiveness of Youth Psychotherapy Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; CRD42021240031.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdolescentAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansPsychotherapychild and adolescent psychotherapycultural adaptationsglobal mental healthlay providersmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36563875
OpenAlexW4311922206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.