Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36563190›Full record

ArticlePhysical review letters2022

State-of-the-Art Estimation of Protein Model Accuracy Using AlphaFold.

James P Roney, Sergey Ovchinnikov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Limitations of the refolding pipeline for de novo protein design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Residue burial encodes a protein's fold.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James P RoneyHarvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Sergey OvchinnikovJohn Harvard Distinguished Science Fellowship Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

Funding

Exploring the unknown protein universe using evolutionary informationDP5OD026389 · OD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI OVCHINNIKOV, SERGEY L. · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NIH HHS DP5 OD026389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The problem of predicting a protein's 3D structure from its primary amino acid sequence is a longstanding challenge in structural biology. Recently, approaches like alphafold have achieved remarkable performance on this task by combining deep learning techniques with coevolutionary data from multiple sequence alignments of related protein sequences. The use of coevolutionary information is critical to these models' accuracy, and without it their predictive performance drops considerably. In living cells, however, the 3D structure of a protein is fully determined by its primary sequence and the biophysical laws that cause it to fold into a low-energy configuration. Thus, it should be possible to predict a protein's structure from only its primary sequence by learning an approximate biophysical energy function. We provide evidence that alphafold has learned such an energy function, and uses coevolution data to solve the global search problem of finding a low-energy conformation. We demonstrate that alphafold'slearned energy function can be used to rank the quality of candidate protein structures with state-of-the-art accuracy, without using any coevolution data. Finally, we explore several applications of this energy function, including the prediction of protein structures without multiple sequence alignments.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsAmino Acid SequenceModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteins

Identifiers

PMID36563190
PMCPMC12178128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.