Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36563099›Full record

ArticleTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2023

Knowledge and participation in mass drug administration against lymphatic filariasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections among the community members in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Diana A Ngunyali, Stella S Mpomele, Manase Kilonzi, Ritah F Mutagonda, Wigilya P Mikomangwa, Hamu J Mlyuka, Wema Kibanga, Alphonce Ignace Marealle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana A NgunyaliSchool of Pharmacy, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P O Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Stella S MpomeleSchool of Pharmacy, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P O Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Manase KilonziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P O Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-5355-8353
Ritah F MutagondaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P O Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Wigilya P MikomangwaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P O Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hamu J MlyukaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P O Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Wema KibangaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P O Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Alphonce Ignace MarealleDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P O Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the WHO has made an effort to ensure optimal participation of the community in mass drug administration (MDA) against lymphatic filariasis (LF) and soil-transmitted helminth infections (STHIs), studies are still reporting suboptimal coverage. This study assessed the knowledge and participation of the community in MDA against LF and SHTIs in Tanzania to provide updates on its acceptability.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Dar es Salaam from December 2021 to February 2022 among market vendors. The information regarding demographic characteristics, knowledge and participation in MDA was collected using a questionnaire. Statistical Package for Social science version 26 was used for data analysis.

resultsMore than half of the participants demonstrated an adequate level of knowledge of LF and STHI, 212 (50.8%) and 267 (64%), respectively. Only 286 (68.5%) reported having heard about MDA against LF and STHIs, out of which 119 (42%) had taken the medication. Of those who disagreed to participate in MDA, 20 (50%) claimed to fear the side effects of the medication.

conclusionsThis study found that the community has average knowledge and poor participation in MDA against LF and STHIs. Community sensitization is recommended to increase the participation of the community.

Indexed as

Elephantiasis, FilarialHelminthiasisHelminthsAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMass Drug AdministrationSoilTanzaniaSoilacceptability of healthcarehelminthsknowledgelymphatic filariasismass drug administrationTanzania

Identifiers

PMID36563099
PMCPMC10153728
OpenAlexW4312115140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.