Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36562979›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2023

Initial report of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and high risk of bleeding in Japan.

Hiroshi Ueno, Teruhiko Imamura, Shuhei Tanaka, Ryuichi Ushijima, Nobuyuki Fukuda, Koichiro Kinugawa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with end-stage renal disease: an individual patient-level meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi UenoThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Teruhiko ImamuraThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan. teimamu@med.u-toyama.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7294-7637
Shuhei TanakaThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Ryuichi UshijimaThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Nobuyuki FukudaThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Koichiro KinugawaThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
University of Toyama · JPToyama University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the countries like Japan where anticoagulation is not recommended in hemodialysis patients, the feasibility of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in hemodialysis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) accompanying high risks of thromboembolic stroke and bleeding remains unknown. Peri-procedural and 45-day clinical outcomes following LAAC using WATCHMAN system, which were performed in our institute between Jun 2020 and April 2022 according to the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines, were retrospectively compared between those with and without hemodialysis. 118 patients (median 79 years, 81 men) consisting of 25 hemodialysis patients and 93 non-hemodialysis patients were included. CHADS score was 3 (2, 4) in the hemodialysis patients and 3 (2, 4) in the non-hemodialysis patients (p = 0.98). HAS-BREAD score was 4 (3, 5) in the hemodialysis patients and 3 (2, 3) in the non-hemodialysis patients (p < 0.001). All procedures were successful, except for a non-hemodialysis patient with a larger left atrial appendage. There were no major complications during index hospitalization and 45-day observational period, except for a hemodialysis patient with suspected bleeding and a non-hemodialysis patient who died due to cardiac amyloidosis. LAAC seems to be feasible in hemodialysis patients with high risks of thromboembolic events and bleedings.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationStrokeAnticoagulantsHemorrhageHumansJapanMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsAnticoagulationAtrial fibrillationThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID36562979
PMCPMC10247845
OpenAlexW4312114524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.